Gladstone, Kansas, keeps bull terriers on list of dangerous animals

by kittymowmow on February 16, 2008

Bull terrier dogs will remain classified as dangerous animals in Gladstone.

For several months, a Gladstone couple — Kirk and Kim Forslund — have raised objections to the city’s inclusion of the breed in its legal definition of pit bulls.

That legal definition was established a year ago when the City Council approved a revised animal control ordinance that classified pit bull breeds as dangerous animals. It also established regulations for new owners of pit bull breeds.

Council members agreed to have city staff review the ordinance last month after Kirk Forslund presented letters from area veterinarians that stated bull terriers are not dangerous.

But on Monday, city staff maintained that bull terriers should not be removed from the dangerous animal classification.

“I’m sure there are some bull terriers that have been socialized and trained,” said City Attorney David Ramsay, “but our animal control officer did not feel there was enough evidence to exclude them from the city’s ordinance.”

Click here (edit 10/16/08, updated link for article: http://www.kccommunitynews.com/articles/2008/02/21/sun_tribune/news/doc47bc4c699d595102723422.txt) for the article that fully recounts the sad, idiotic tale of yet another decision to legislate against a breed, regardless of the obvious fact that animals are only consistently, repeatedly bad when they have been trained by PEOPLE to be so, not because of their breed.

Kitty Mowmow is disgusted by anti-breed legislation, in case you haven’t noticed.  So disgusted, in fact, that she has been shocked into referring to herself in the 3rd person.

What do you think?

Related articles from Kitty Mowmow:

Viewing 4 Comments

 

Trackbacks

(Trackback URL)

close Reblog this comment
blog comments powered by Disqus