Animal activists say S.F. tiger attack supports case against zoos

by kittymowmow on December 29, 2007

tiger-regal_1024x768.jpg

The recent tiger attack in San Francisco has given a platform to animal rights activists, who say holding wild animals in captivity is cruel, for-profit entertainment and should be stopped.

Those who despise zoos - and not just PETA, though the group did join the chorus - say the attack proves that animals are unhappy and that zoos should be phased out.

“The major problem with zoos is they put the entertainment value at a higher priority than the welfare or well-being of the animals,” said Elliot Katz, president of In Defense of Animals, a Mill Valley animal rights group. “Because elephants and tigers are big draws, the zoo creates dangerous situations.”

Katz helped organize the effort to get the elephants removed from the San Francisco Zoo after obtaining medical records that showed they were being mistreated. He said that both elephants and tigers need much more space than the zoo provides.

Click here to read the full article.

Related articles from Kitty Mowmow:

Viewing 10 Comments

Trackbacks

(Trackback URL)

close Reblog this comment
blog comments powered by Disqus